Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Nathan Ponwith vs Maxwell Mckennon Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Ponwith vs Mckennon analysis and find out who is favored!
Nathan Ponwith vs Maxwell Mckennon Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Ponwith 1 - 0 Mckennon
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Ponwith has won 50.16% of points on their second serve, while Mckennon has won 48.95%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Ponwith, in recent form, has won 50.98% of their opponent's second serve points, while Mckennon has won 49.02%. The same stats for first serve returns are 33.18% and 33.33% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Ponwith has saved 56.7% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Mckennon has saved 51.61% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Ponwith has won 36.36% of matches played (W/L 20/ 35), with Mckennon winning 59.38% (W/L 19/ 13) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Ponwith has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 58% (W/L 38/ 27), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 36% (W/L 8/ 14). Mckennon has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 75% (W/L 3/ 1), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 50% (W/L 22/ 22).
- Player level: In the last year, Ponwith has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 21.43% of matches (W/L 6/ 22), where as Mckennon has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 60% of matches (W/L 15/ 10). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Ponwith winning 1 times and Mckennon being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Ponwith winning 2 and Mckennon winning 0. The last match between Ponwith and Mckennon was at the M15 Los Angeles, 21-06-2023, First, Hard with Nathan Ponwith getting the victory 6-4 6-4.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:51:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Ponwith and Mckennon have played a deciding set 0 times, with Ponwith winning 0 times and Mckennon 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Ponwith winning 0, and Mckennon 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Ponwith has played against opponents with an average rank of 161.51 while Mckennon has played against players with an average rank of 101.59.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Ponwith has won 56% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Mckennon has won 60% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Ponwith has converted 41.15% of breakpoint opportunities, and Mckennon has converted 40% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
793
Rank
367
High
26
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
22
Age
Plays
W
L
W
W
L
L
W
W
W
W
Form
L
W
W
L
L
L
W
W
W
L
56% (174-137)
Career Total W/L
52% (25-23)
50% (15-15)
YTD W/L
58% (7-5)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Nathan Ponwith vs Maxwell Mckennon For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Ponwith VS Mckennon
Sportsbook
Offer
| stats | Nathan Ponwith | Maxwell Mckennon |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 8 |
| Aces (Total) | 5 | 4 |
| DFs (Total) | 1 | 2 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:51:0 | 1:51:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 67% (40/60) | 56% (33/59) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 70% (28/40) | 85% (28/33) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 75% (15/20) | 42% (11/26) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 67% (2/3) | 0% (0/2) |
| Return Points W% | 34% (20/59) | 28% (17/60) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-4 |
Stats 
Nathan Ponwith
Player
Maxwell Mckennon
67%
(
40 of
60)
1st Serve %
56%
(
33 of
59)
5
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
2
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
85%
(
28 of
33)
75%
(
15 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
28%
(
17 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
20 of
59)
63
Total Points Won
56
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Nathan Ponwith | Maxwell Mckennon |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 50% (15/15) | 58% (7/5) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 46% (33/38) | 54% (15/13) |
| Games Win/Loss | 49% (328/340) | 52% (126/115) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 57% (13/10) | 58% (7/5) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 40% (2/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.24 | 0.3 |
| Aces Total | 79 | 35 |
| DFs per game | 0.38 | 0.25 |
| DFs Total | 124 | 29 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:26:1 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 185.4 | 134 |
| 1st Serve % | 58% (1306/2239) | 64% (421/658) |
| 1st Serve W% | 65% (855/1306) | 65% (275/421) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 50% (468/933) | 49% (116/237) |
| BPs Won% Total | 41% (86/209) | 40% (26/65) |
| Return Pts W% | 40% (853/2134) | 40% (256/648) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 29% (2/5) | 57% (4/3) |
| Futures W/L | 57% (13/10) | 60% (3/2) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (15/30) | 58% (7/12) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 56% (5/9) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set W% | 73% (8/11) | 75% (3/4) |
| 1st set W, W | 77% (13/10) | 100% (5/5) |
| 1st set W, L | 23% (13/3) | 0% (5/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 29% (17/5) | 29% (7/2) |
Nathan Ponwith Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF |
Stats
Nathan Ponwith
Player
Patrick Maloney
51%
(
40 of
79)
1st Serve %
70%
(
63 of
90)
1
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
3
88%
(
35 of
40)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
43 of
63)
54%
(
21 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
23 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
35 of
90)
91
Total Points Won
78
|
4-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Nathan Ponwith
Player
Derek Pham
70%
(
73 of
104)
1st Serve %
57%
(
59 of
103)
6
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
7
71%
(
52 of
73)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
41 of
59)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
14 of
44)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
37%
(
38 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
48 of
103)
114
Total Points Won
93
|
6-7(6) 6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Nathan Ponwith
Player
Alexander Petrov
70%
(
78 of
111)
1st Serve %
57%
(
50 of
87)
2
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
4
69%
(
54 of
78)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
29 of
50)
36%
(
12 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
24 of
37)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
41%
(
45 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
34 of
87)
100
Total Points Won
98
|
5-7 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nathan Ponwith
Player
Henrik Wiersholm
55%
(
57 of
103)
1st Serve %
64%
(
57 of
89)
5
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
4
63%
(
36 of
57)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
29 of
57)
52%
(
24 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
42%
(
43 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
43 of
89)
103
Total Points Won
89
|
6-3 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alan Fernando Rubio Fierros
Player
Nathan Ponwith
65%
(
70 of
107)
1st Serve %
59%
(
73 of
123)
0
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
7
64%
(
45 of
70)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
41 of
73)
43%
(
16 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
25 of
50)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
43%
(
46 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
57 of
123)
118
Total Points Won
112
|
3-6 7-6(10) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Learner Tien
Player
Nathan Ponwith
71%
(
36 of
51)
1st Serve %
58%
(
30 of
52)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
83%
(
30 of
36)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
19 of
30)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
14 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
26 of
52)
63
Total Points Won
40
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Nathan Ponwith
Player
Collin Altamirano
57%
(
58 of
101)
1st Serve %
59%
(
52 of
88)
4
Aces
6
7
Double Faults
1
59%
(
34 of
58)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
34 of
52)
44%
(
19 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
15 of
36)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
48%
(
48 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
39 of
88)
92
Total Points Won
97
|
6-4 1-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nathan Ponwith
Player
Harsh Parikh
57%
(
31 of
54)
1st Serve %
46%
(
25 of
54)
3
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
6
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
18 of
25)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
30%
(
16 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
26 of
54)
64
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Bruno Kuzuhara
Player
Nathan Ponwith
63%
(
47 of
75)
1st Serve %
58%
(
32 of
55)
1
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
5
60%
(
28 of
47)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
61%
(
17 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
4 of
23)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
40%
(
30 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
30 of
55)
75
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Nathan Ponwith
Player
Aidan Mchugh
50%
(
30 of
60)
1st Serve %
68%
(
39 of
57)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
0
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
37%
(
22 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
28 of
57)
66
Total Points Won
51
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Maxwell Mckennon Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Learner Tien
Player
Maxwell Mckennon
68%
(
44 of
65)
1st Serve %
56%
(
30 of
54)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
64%
(
28 of
44)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
40%
(
26 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
31 of
54)
70
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maxwell Mckennon
Player
Alexander Chang
71%
(
58 of
82)
1st Serve %
57%
(
47 of
82)
5
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
62%
(
36 of
58)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
31 of
47)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
41%
(
34 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
35 of
82)
83
Total Points Won
81
|
6-3 2-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-3 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-0 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Collin Altamirano
Player
Maxwell Mckennon
63%
(
40 of
63)
1st Serve %
59%
(
36 of
61)
6
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
5
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
26 of
36)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
33%
(
21 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
24 of
61)
66
Total Points Won
58
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Liam Broady
Player
Maxwell Mckennon
60%
(
34 of
57)
1st Serve %
51%
(
23 of
45)
8
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
88%
(
30 of
34)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
15 of
23)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
28%
(
16 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
21 of
45)
62
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Thai Kwiatkowski
Player
Maxwell Mckennon
57%
(
35 of
61)
1st Serve %
62%
(
44 of
71)
3
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
5
66%
(
23 of
35)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
29 of
44)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
8 of
27)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
36%
(
22 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
34 of
71)
73
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Maxwell Mckennon
Player
Keegan Smith
66%
(
39 of
59)
1st Serve %
65%
(
36 of
55)
1
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
2
77%
(
30 of
39)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
31%
(
18 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
23 of
55)
64
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Maxwell Mckennon
Player
George Goldhoff
55%
(
39 of
71)
1st Serve %
54%
(
43 of
80)
6
Aces
9
2
Double Faults
11
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
28 of
43)
69%
(
22 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
20 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
35 of
80)
86
Total Points Won
65
|
6-7(1) 6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Learner Tien
Player
Maxwell Mckennon
56%
(
39 of
70)
1st Serve %
70%
(
55 of
79)
3
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
69%
(
27 of
39)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
28 of
55)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
37%
(
26 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
40 of
79)
84
Total Points Won
65
|
6-2 3-6 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Ponwith Vs Mckennon Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Ponwith are available here and Mckennon photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
